Little Synapses

Epilepsy · For clinicians

Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome: Comparing the US and European Treatment Approaches

By Yash D. Shah, MD, MPH · Pediatric neurologist & epileptologist · Adapted from posts on X, February 1, 2025

Cartoon of a bridge linking maps of Europe and the United States, with a brain and pill characters walking across.
Two continents, two complementary approaches to LGS.

Two recent expert papers, one from Europe and one from the United States, offer contrasting but complementary views on managing Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS). Here is how they compare.

This piece is adapted from my thread on the two papers. [view on X]

What is LGS?

LGS is a severe, childhood-onset developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE). It is marked by multiple drug-resistant seizure types, specific EEG patterns and significant cognitive and behavioral impairment. Early diagnosis can be difficult. [view on X]

Diagnosis requires multiple types of drug-resistant seizures (including tonic seizures), cognitive and often behavioral impairment, and specific EEG findings: diffuse slow spike-and-wave and generalized paroxysmal fast activity. [view on X]

The European approach

The European algorithm is stepwise: valproate first, then lamotrigine, then rufinamide. If seizures persist, it suggests considering cannabidiol (CBD), clobazam, felbamate, fenfluramine (FFA) and topiramate. The focus is on licensed medicines and practical guidance. [view on X]

The European paper gives particular attention to the newer anti-seizure medications (ASMs), cannabidiol and fenfluramine, including licensing (in Europe, CBD is licensed with clobazam), efficacy and side effects. [view on X]

The US approach

The US expert panel emphasizes a personalized approach, starting with either valproate or clobazam as first-line therapy, especially for disabling drop seizures. [view on X]

The US paper looks closely at meta-analyses in LGS and notes conflicting results due to varying study designs, which underscores the need for personalized treatment and careful evaluation of the evidence. [view on X]

It also reviews off-label ASMs such as perampanel, brivaracetam and cenobamate alongside the eight FDA-approved drugs, widening the options for difficult cases. [view on X]

Key differences

The biggest difference concerns clobazam. The US paper suggests it can be a first-line therapy, particularly for disabling drop seizures, and notes the synergistic effects of clobazam and cannabidiol. The European paper treats it as a later adjunctive therapy. [view on X]

The American algorithm is consensus-based, with valproate or clobazam as first-line options and clobazam a strong consideration for disabling drop seizures. Second-line options are grouped together, including clobazam if it has not already been used. [view on X]

Side-by-side pathways: Europe stepwise valproate, lamotrigine, rufinamide, then other options; US first line valproate or clobazam, grouped second line, off-label options; both use diet, VNS and callosotomy.
The European and US pathways side by side, as summarized in the two papers.

Where they agree

Both papers stress non-drug approaches, including the ketogenic diet, vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) and corpus callosotomy, used alongside ASM therapy. The American algorithm also notes that felbamate is used only after careful consideration. [view on X]

Let's discuss

What do you think of these two approaches? I'd love to hear from fellow clinicians and families. [view on X]

Links to both papers (US and European) are in the original thread. [view on X]

This is general information, not medical advice. Please talk with your child's doctor about their care.

Want more clear, evidence-first breakdowns on pediatric neurology and epilepsy?

Follow me on X (@WaveWatcherMD)